During
the 10 years Hillary was working at the telecoms company, it seemed like she
was there to stay. Some of the employees joked around telling her she seemed to
have an asset number just like any other equipment in the company. She had been
the longest serving employee at the company by the time she decided to move on to
competition. During her stay at the company, Hillary recalls, the employer seems
to have gotten so used to her that she felt misused and not allowed to
undertake more exciting engagements.
As the
company excelled in terms of number of customers and the profits soared every
subsequent year, it seemed like the directors seemed to value the employees
less and placed more premium on the customers. Indeed, the management evoked
the statement that the customer was king and this was truly reflected in the
behaviors of the senior management team on the staff.
To
please the clients, the management reviewed the working hours of the staff and
increased them by an extra 2 hours. They did not however consider it worthwhile
to review the staff remuneration. The management did not consider recruiting
extra hands with the enhanced work and considered the present staff as having
been underutilized and should hence naturally fit in. After going through this
challenge for 8 months, Hillary decided to move on to competition.
Unbeknown
to the management, a month after Hillary’s departure, the number of clients
started to drop and so significant was the drop that the management was moved
to act. It was realized that most of the clients had learnt of Hillary’s
departure from the company and decided to follow her wherever she went. The
management considered the facts and decided to review the terms of service for
the remaining staff and hoped by their increased concern for staff, the client base
will be sustained at least for the foreseeable future.
It is
mythical for an employer to imagine that the departure of a staff does not
affect business performance. As much as
some employers feel like they can treat their staff as they wish and would
easily replace them should they consider departing, the loss to the company is
often far more than imagined. Staff are the core of the engine of the
operations and management of any workplace and should hence be treated with
utmost respect and consideration. Whenever the employer has to make a decision
that would affect both the staff and the clients, it would be prudent to first
engage staff in the decision making process so as to act in the best interest
of the staff.
Acting
in favor of the clients usually produces short term results while providing
adequate support and been seen to be concerned about staff welfare would
produce more sustainable results. Companies that have learned the art of
placing premium value on their staff have been known to reap the benefits that
accrue. Staff develop a strong loyalty to the company brand and act as the best
ambassadors hence sustaining company sales and perception among clients. It is
common knowledge that staff can easily sabotage the progress of a company when
they feel undervalued hence the need to value the employees more for more value
to the business.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I highly appreciate your comment (s)...let's chat.