As the
dust settles on the 2011/2012 season of the English Premier League, and as the
celebration and sulking give way to reality, several lessons abound from the
league. As Manchester City went on to win the coveted cup after waiting for an
entire 44 years, a wait longer than the average age of most of the persons
reading this column today, the win did not come without its share of the good
and the ugly experiences. Key among the experiences relate to one Mario
Balotelli. His behavior on and off pitch have made him the discussion point
across the globe since as much as he is a super player of great strength, he is
loved and hated in equal measure because of his unpredictable character.
This
experience brings to mind the age old question on how to best manage staff who
are great performers but possess undesirable character qualities. You must have
come across the said personalities where a staff has been hailed as great
performer but has character flaws that could jeopardize the otherwise good
performance. The said staff could be a gossip, uses vulgar language on
colleagues and clients or even attempts to defraud the company once in a while.
Should we be concerned about staff character so long as they are good
performers? Shouldn't performance be all that matters?
For a
staff to be branded as a good performer, we should consider more factors and
not just their achievement of the laid out targets and objectives. As much as
hitting the target is a great thing for a staff, hitting the targets through
moral processes should always be the concern of every staff. The character of
the staff determines the overall performance of the team. If the character of
one staff affects the performance of the rest of the team, it should be a reason
to worry by the management. The employer should be keen to reward an employee
not just because of what they have achieved but for both ‘the what and the how’
they have achieved the indicated targets.
As much
as a staff’s performance is great today regardless of the character, only time
will tell since character flaws have been known to cripple great performers. We
have witnessed great politicians, religious leaders, footballers and great
parents brought down to their knees by their poor character. It has been said
that character is the foundation on which every sustainable success is built.
Without a positive character, the current performance is truly built on quicksand
and should hence not be celebrated. How many of the leaders around us have we
frowned upon due to their poor character regardless of their great performance?
This is
therefore a wakeup call to all staff, recruiters and supervisors to place equal
premium on both character and performance. I overheard a senior executive
indicate that they would rather pick on character given a choice between performance
and character. The reasoning is that staff of good character can easily be
moulded to perform while persons of poor character generally take a while to be
reformed as they may not in the first place value a personal reform agenda. No
wonder most of the employers today seek to know more about the candidates they
interview beyond their indicated high achievement on the CV.
And so,
as you consider your career growth, find ways of strengthening the foundation
and beautifying the paths by reflecting positive and admirable character. You
can never go wrong with a good character. It is a trait that will take you
places.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I highly appreciate your comment (s)...let's chat.